On 26/11/14 07:40, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > 2601:c:ce00:9d01 is 2601:000c:ce00:9d01 > 2601:c:ce00:9d1 is 2601:000c:ce00:09d1 > > So no? :)
The issue is that this is supposedly a /60, and so only addresses in the range 2601:c:ce00:9d0x::/60 are valid. The question is actually about how CeroWRT subnet hints cope with nybble alignment of subnets as opposed to byte/octet alignments. -- Robert Bradley _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
