I saw this go by today... https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-ybA8_Lt-gwc2RUWnN5eFFoekE/view
also: http://venturebeat.com/2014/12/12/google-launches-the-open-web-of-things-inviting-research-proposals-to-advance-the-internet-of-things/ I really hate that I do not qualify as an "academic"[1], nor do the other many open source developers advancing the state of the art - and probably would have trouble passing that particular bar... nor do I know what, specifically we do here that could apply to the parameters of this grant program... ... but doing another cerowrt version, make-wifi-fast, tinc-fq, fq_codel improvement, or any of the half dozen things like making dnssec, ipv6, or source specific routing more deployable... that we have done as outgrowths of the bufferbloat effort... on the same budget (nearly none) as we have survived on for the last 4 years, is just *not in the cards*. At least not for me! It's been fun working with you all, and wonderfully productive... but I'd like to get off of top ramen. Are there things in the above, in the context of making home networking safer/smarter/faster/better, that could apply? Or any context, really? (benchmarking? simulation work) I did submit a proposal elsewhere for the "make fair queuing work well with vpns" idea that I proposed on this list earlier this month, rather than sit down and spend the time to actually do it... ... and I am looking over various other SBIR and NSF style grants. ... and trying to figure out what to do next year, that makes sense. -- Dave Täht [1] I would really like to find a way to partner up formally with a uni or two. http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
