oh, they are using a nice ethernet chip from intel? That will help. I did feel the apu1c was improvable, but the intel "dma to cache" since ivy bridge feature is a tremendous advantage for intel chips.
Sigh, more benchmarking.... On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Sebastian Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi List, > the following might just be what we need to replace the WNDR as a > hig(er)-speed capable traffic shaper: > > http://www.fit-pc.com/web/products/specifications/fitlet-models-specifications/?model%5B%5D=fitlet-B+%28TBA%29&model%5B%5D=fitlet-X+%28TBA%29&model%5B%5D=fitlet-i+%28TBA%29 > > The entry level model fitlet-B is estimated at $129 (requires ram and msata), > no information about the more interesting fitlet-i (2 GE ports). The AMD > Jaguar SoC is supposedly more powerfull then the AMD G series T40E in the > pc-engines api-1d ( http://www.pcengines.ch/apu1d.htm ) that was not that hot > network wise ( http://planet.ipfire.org/post/pc-engines-apu1c-a-review ). > Improvements include twice the L2, slightly faster DRAM, slightly tweaked > core, an potentially “turbo” up to 1.6Ghz from 1GHz base, intel GE chip i211 > with BQL support. Downside the intel AC wifi card most likely will not allow > proper tweaking (so maybe not suited for the make-wifi-fast project) > So most likely this thing will also not be able to do SQM/Cake at > 300Mbps combined or better. Would it not be sweet to finally be able to > “retire” the wndrs… > > Best Regards > Sebastian > -- Dave Täht thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
