On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 9:13 PM Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > > On Oct 22, 2018, at 11:51 PM, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is one of those endless bikesheds I'd totally given up on. Thx ted! > > > If you're feeling like an adventure, you might find the latest draft of the > homenet naming architecture entertaining. > > https://github.com/ietf-homenet-wg/simple-naming/blob/master/draft-ietf-homenet-simple-naming.txt
Read it just now. this is an ietf notion of "simple", yes? > > I decided to keep going on it since the submission deadline was extended, so > it's pretty close to feature complete except for the HNCP part. > > I'm curious: are you using HNCP on your networks? Mikael is the sole survivor here, so far as I know. 2 years back, I gave up on deploying ipv6 any further than the lab. Getting dynamic ipv6 reliably into my production network... I gave up. I asked for a static allocation from comcast, haven't heard back yet. As examples that persist, dhcpv6-pd renewals seem to be broken in openwrt still, so I get a bunch of prefixes... and a few a days later they vanish. I get static routes to nowhere, often, out of that. And: with only a /60 available, I also run out of prefixes to allocate if something reboots at the wrong time at the wrong place, and so on. > -- Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740 _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
