Good grief, can't we kill off NAT? IPv4.01 isn't IPv6. What does the other end think your IPv6 source address is? Can your tethered systems pass addressable endpoints to the other end, and expect them to work? Or will there be STUN6/TURN6 needed to do, say, WebRTC peering?
On Tuesday, January 28, 2020 12:51pm, "Michael Richardson" <[email protected]> said: > Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > > I got a new phone for christmas, and was surprised to see I finally had > an > IPv6 > > allocation on my tether. More surprising was seeing fc:: used... and > > while my laptop > > Sounds like your phone has decided to use NAT66, as fc:: is a ULA. > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ > ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails > [ > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
