> On Aug 23, 2018, at 10:26 AM, Pete Heist <p...@heistp.net> wrote: > >> On Aug 23, 2018, at 2:49 AM, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com >> <mailto:dave.t...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I had a chance to give a talk at broadcom recently, slides here: >> >> http://flent-fremont.bufferbloat.net/~d/broadcom_aug9.pdf >> <http://flent-fremont.bufferbloat.net/~d/broadcom_aug9.pdf> > > Thanks for sharing, this is really useful, raising awareness where it > matters. Quite a bit of content... :) > > Ubiquiti needs some work getting this into more of their products (EdgeMAX in > particular). A good time to lobby for this might be, well a couple months > ago, as they’re producing alpha builds for their upcoming 2.0 release with > kernel 4.9 and new Cavium/Mediatek/Octeon SDKs. I just asked about the status > in the EdgeRouter Beta forum, in case it finds the right eyes before the > release: > > https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter-Beta/BQL-support/m-p/2466657 > <https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter-Beta/BQL-support/m-p/2466657>
This started a discussion, and no, so far it looks like there’s no BQL support in the upcoming 2.0 release. For my own benefit, re-reading the original patch series comment (https://lwn.net/Articles/469652/ <https://lwn.net/Articles/469652/>) makes it sound like BQL is useful even without AQM (original benchmarks were done with straight pfifo_fast). I didn’t realize this, actually. If anything incorrect about BQL was said in this discussion, correct us, please… :) Pete
_______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
