Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Paul Hoffman wrote: >> No, I'm saying that the order in which you are supposed to take the >> DCs has historically been unclear. "Most significant" means different >> things to different people. >> > I probably sound like a broken record, but the order is very clear for > LDAP. I don't see why is this going to be different for X.509 certificates.
Yes, I concur RFC 2247 is pretty clear and is meant to be applied to X.500 names as well. Ciao, Michael. _______________________________________________ certid mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid
