On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 06:57:50PM +0200, Martin Rex wrote: > [...] > But frankly, I do no see much value in trying to describe all possible > interpretation of a fairly vague wording, that itself was an attempt > to characterize, NOT specify, what kind of behaviour there is in the > installed base. Leaving the vague description of rfc-2818 as is, > and pointing out more prominently that it is really deprecated > should be perfectly sufficient. > > -Martin
I'm in full agreement. -- Shumon Huque University of Pennsylvania. _______________________________________________ certid mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid
