Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
[...]
Oops, there were some typos and missing words. That's what I get for
replying to email while eating breakfast at 6 AM. Corrected text:

###

    Note:  In some application protocols, the procedure described in
    this section can be performed by an application server acting as a
    TLS client when verifying a server-to-server connection, not only by

s/TLS client/TLS server/

    an application client when verifying a client-to-server connection
    (e.g, this is true of XMPP).  In this case, the application server
    verifies the identity of the peer server that is attempting to
    connect and therefore the reference identifier is in essence
    supplied by the peer server (e.g., as triggered by a request to send
    a message from an entity associated with the peer server to an

I think it is not clear who is verifying (probably because both parties are for xmpp-s2s). What about:

In some application protocols, the procedure described in this section can also be performed by an application server when verifying a incoming [server-to-server?] connection from a peer, not only when verifying an outgoing connection (e.g., this is true for XMPP). In this case, the application server, acting as a TLS server, verifies the identity of the TLS client and the reference identifier is in essence supplied by the peer [...]

[where the peer server is the TLS client]

    entity associated with the application service).  Other than the
    source of the reference identifier and the inverted roles of the TLS
    client and TLS server, the verification process remains unchanged.

+1
_______________________________________________
certid mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid

Reply via email to