I do have a manual way of trigger runs based on different data but that path isn't as polished as the recursive bundle poller.
While I think moving to MPs does make sense the current CI will help us catch any breaking change quickly. For now I think that will be enough. If we adjust our process to be MP based then we can look at using tarmac and the manual trigger of CI to get jobs running. -Ben On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Kapil Thangavelu < [email protected]> wrote: > are we switching out to merge proposals and landing based on ci then or > just trunk commits and ci on trunk poll? > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Benjamin Saller < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> This can and will trigger automatically, however the development needed >> to make CATs function is ongoing. I expect to have this working today. I'll >> let you know when results are ready and then tie the output of failures to >> the maiing list >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:27 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ben, >>> >>> I guess we are ready for CATs. Could you describe how to trigger it on >>> CI? >>> >>> -Alex Prismakov >>> >>> -- >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~cf-charmers >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~cf-charmers >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >> >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~cf-charmers >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~cf-charmers >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~cf-charmers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~cf-charmers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
