I certainly grok the idea of things going too far, but sometimes I think
people get too paranoid. Ok, so maybe it's a _good_ thing to be paranoid
about your freedoms, but on the other hand, I do not accept your aguement
because it does not directly attack the issue at hand, which is cameras in
public. Heck, you could say cops _in general_ lead to abuse, but that
wouldn't be a good argument, would it? Don't tell me, "This policy is bad
because it could lead to ..."
As a society, we have said that we do not allow for _absolute_ personal
freedom. If we did, murder would be acceptable. So, we do have to accept
compromises in order to live in safety.
Ray Camden
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Phillip Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 4:32 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Cameras in the Office.
>
>
> > What I don't get is why this upsets people. Who expects privacy
> when they
> are out in public?
>
> Where does it stop?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
