as best I can tell, they have been accurate in the past. I'd be interested in hearing if this order reaches you. I see Larry's point but I think the timing is pretty suspect...
Dana
>Like you said earlier the move makes a certain tactical sense to begin with,
>I mean there were offices at state were you couldn't have anything
>electronic, not even a pager. However I think the enforcement of such a
>proclomation would be very difficult.
>
>Somethings that struck me as off about the piece though. It's an AFP piece.
>Not even AP. Plus it's published out of Austrailia. weird.
>
>Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 3:54 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: this was predicted....
>
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> must be a very new order, hasn't had time to filter down from the
> press to the military chain of command yet.
>
> Anyhow hope you're enjoying the weather down there. I'm really sorry
> that you will be heading over to Afghanistan while Abu Ghrave is
> happening. Its only going to make your job a lot harder.
>
> BTW enjoy the Afghani cuisine when you're there. There used to be a
> very good little Afghani restaurant here, and I got hooked on the
> food.
>
> Remember to keep your head down and your rifle barrel up.
>
> larry
>
> >I am sitting on Ft. Bragg getting ready to deploy, and I can assure you
>that
> >no one has told us we can't have digital cameras.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 10:59 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: this was predicted....
> >
> >
> > I forget by whom. Camera phones and digital cameras are now banned in
>the
> >US military.
> >
> > http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1114150.htm
> >
> > suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure we have nothing to hide...
> >
> > Dana
> >
> >
> >
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
