Re: comments part 1

[dana tierney]

or when, as here, the post was very long. It's a reasonable compromise imho; a reminder for the 95% of the cases where the the post is long due to lack of trimmng, but it posts anyway so you can in fact write a genuinely long post.

Dana

>I've got the same thing a couple of times when I forgot to trim the original
>message.
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 2:50 PM
>  To: CF-Community
>  Subject: RE: comments part 1
>
>
>  >Funny,
>  >I received it intact.
>
>  Here's what I received (just the first bit of course:
>
>  Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 14:35:38 -0400
>  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Subject: Body too long: RE: comments?
>  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12
>  Status:
>
>  The body of your email message is over 100 lines. Unless you are a
>  major writer, your probably adding a lot of the previous replies.
>  Please trim your posts when replying. Thank you.
>
>  >Larry,
>
>  real strange. It apparently bounced it and let it through at the same time.
>
>  larry
>  --
>
>  Larry C. Lyons
>
>  ========================================================
>  Life is Complex. It has both real and imaginary parts.
>  ========================================================
>  Chaos, Panic and Disorder. My work here is done.

---

[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

---