very plausible. Necessary to gain public support. Otherwise it was just
their problem.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lyons, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:32 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: comments?
Agreed. Whether its deliberate (as some historians have argued regarding the
two world wars) or accidental is hard to say. But there have been situations
where a faster intervention, i.e.., Kosovo, Bosnia, Burundi and Rwanda,
where it may have made a significant difference.
larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Ousterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 2:24 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: comments?
>
>
> I believe that one could form a solid argument that our/USA's
> fundamental problem is that we wait to act in any meaningful
> fashion until force is the only solution.
>
> So that problem isn't that we act too quickly, it is that we
> act too slowly.
>
> Andy
>
>
> More recently
> however there has been a significant humanitarian component
> to the US
> becoming involved in local or regional conflicts, when this
> country finally
> gets off its butt and acts.
>
> larry
>
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
