point. You go and do your duty, and you make sure you vote your beliefs.
There have always been people opposed to every war. People that refused to
be drafted in World War 2. It's nonsense. Service is the cost of freedom.
-----Original Message-----
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 1:40 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The return of the Draft in the US.
yeah it is. Unless unless it is an unconscionable war. There was a case to
be made for refusing to go to Vietnam in my opinion. Especially after My
Lai.
>hooahh.
>
>good answer.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Won Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 10:41 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: The return of the Draft in the US.
>
>
> I don't understand the subject of this thread.
>
> Do you mean?
> A) The mechanics/law to conduct a draft was abolished and is back now?
>
> Then you would be incorrect, because the mechanics/law to conduct a
draft
> have been in place for a long time.
>
> B) They are conducting a draft right now?
>
> I'm pretty sure this is not what you meant, but the subject begs the
>question.
>
> C) Or that there is a strong probability that the US will be conducting
a
> draft in the neat future?
>
> Then I guess the subject should have been The POSSIBLE return of the
Draft
> in the US as not to give them impression the mechanics of the draft
were
> not in place before.
>
> That said, I do find it rather suspicious that Selective Service is
> receiving additional funding.
> If I'm called to war I would be honor bound to go regardless of my
>opinions
> about the war itself.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
