Absolutely, one can think abortion is sometimes morally wrong and still be pro-choice, I feel that way and I believe I am very pro-choice.  However, condoning abortion as murder, as some have done on this thread, is imposing moral views on others.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: dana tierney
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 3:55 AM
  Subject: Re: Conversation Topic - Abortion

  > "you" was generic!

  ok :) again, checking, because what you are rebutting is close to my view

  > pro-choice doesnt' dictate anyone elses morality - calling abortion
  > murder calls it that for all people - i.e. says its a wrong choice for
  > more than just myself.

  And hmm, not sure I agree. Murder is definitely a loaded word. It does imply that the fetus is alive, human and entitled to keep living. I know you (Beth) can issue with the last of those assumptions. Maybe I do too. However I do think you can think abortion is sometimes, perhaps, possibly or probably wrong and yet be pro-choice. Those are not incompatible positions.

  You can defend the right of someone to speak up in a cause you believe is wrong, right? So thinking a thing is wrong does not mean that you have to try to keep it from happening, or even that you should. Similarly I can deplore the number of abortions each year without condemning any specific woman's actions. In my opinion.

  Dana

  > ----- Original Message -----
   
  > From: dana tierney
   
  > To: CF-Community
   
  > Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 9:54 PM
   
  > Subject: Re: Conversation Topic - Abortion
  >
  >
   
  > I don't know if your "you" here" explicitly means me. If so, then I am
  > not totally sure it would be murder, though I include that way. It's
  > again a matter of definition. But I very carefully don't impose my
  > views on others  when I say that my religious views are irrelevant to
  > a discussion of social policy. Some people with this belief think that
  > it is their duty to try to prevent a murder -- the picketers outside
  > my office complex for example. It's logicaly sound based on their
  > premises. I just don't agree, I guess with the premises.
  >
   
  > I am not sure that you can say people are imposing their views on you
  > until they have guns and policemen to back them up. Or at least
  > significant moral authority which you accept. For example, the
  > Catholic church is attempting to impose its views on abortion on its
  > members when it decrees that people who vote for pro-choice
  > politicians should not receive the sacraments. The attempt is largely
  > irrelevant if you are not concerned with the opinion of the Catholic
  > church.
  >
   
  > So supposing I were to think a given abortion was murder according to
  > some definition -- if this is simply my unexpressed private opinion
  > then I don't see that it imposes anything on you at all. If I were
  > screaming epithets at the mother it begins to come close...If I am
  > amending the law then it does, for sure.
  >
   
  > Dana
  >
   
  > > I am pro-choice - i think your choice to have a severely handicapped
  >
   
  > > child is as valid as mine not to.
   
  > > By calling my choice "murder" (which is illegal) thats imposing your
  >
   
  > > religious or moral views upon me.
      
  >
   
  > > ----- Original Message -----
      
  >
   
  > > From: dana tierney
      
  >
   
  > > To: CF-Community
      
  >
   
  > > Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 10:49 AM
      
  >
   
  > > Subject: Re: Conversation Topic - Abortion
   
  > >
   
  > >
      
  >
   
  > > how so?
   
  > >
      
  >
   
  > > > Except that the view that abortion is murder and should be illegal
  >
   
  > > is
      
  >
   
  > > > inherently imposed on others, I think.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to