> I read a piece yesterday about Reagan, and learned that Donald
> Rumsfeld was something like Reagan's "Special Attache to the Middle
> East", and was personally and directly in charge of our sponsoring and
> support or Saddam and Iraq.
>
> I thought it was only personal for George W.
>
> I knew about his involvment in the first Gulf War, but this was news
> to me.
>
> Should I have known this already?
It would seem appropriate to know that the main reason Rumsfeld knew Iraq had in the past had WMD was that he was material in making sure they had them. From there the assumption that Iraq still had them last year is only a very small leap.
Jochem
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
