is ok, its not like hat messy un-American activity called sex. Unless
torture is involved then its interrogation.
Anyone notice that Cheney was caught red handed lying about what he said
about the Iraq Al Queda connections. Now he's claiming that they thought
there was a connection, when a year ago he was strongly asserting that there
was multiple meetings.
As for the latest piece of evidence, that an relatively low level
para-military officer in Saddam's regime was at an Al-Queda strategy
session. Apparently what that accusation hinged on the person having a
similar name as an Al-Queda officer.
I guess they've never heard of names like John Smith and Jon Smith.
larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marwan Saidi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 8:47 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Rumsfeld's Wordplay
>
>
> I caught this last night, but it was late and I was tired.
> not sure of the channel.
>
> Rumsfeld is on the screen with some foreign dignitary type
> and apparently gets a question about torture. He then says
> something along the lines of "People have different
> definitions of that word. When that word is used, it doesn't
> always mean what some people think it means".
>
> This blew me away. I mean hell, the GOP jumped all over
> Clinton for his definition of sex, now they use the same
> argument, but for torture?
>
> ack
>
> Marwan Saidi
> Webmaster - PFH
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
