http://www.sierraclub.org/environmentallaw/cheney_case/
and although I need a dictionary (mandamus?) hmm it looks as this is a
procederal ducking of the issue (?)
It does put the issue onto a back burner until after the election.
Was also interested to see that Scalia dissented in part. Reserving
judgement on whether he has been misjudged or is just smart :) I still
think he should have recused himself.
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:07:26 -0500
Subject: Re: Fw: Breaking News - Supreme Court: Vice president doesn't
have to release energy task force records
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Much as I want to see Cheney taken down, the ruling was 7-2. It's not
like it was a very split vote that hinged on Scalia.
-Kevin
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:43:20 -0600, dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> outstanding.
>
> And of course he didn't recuse himself? Someone invited me to a Sierra
> Club presentation on this court case. Their lawyer was sort of
> expecting this. It's indefensible of course.... the entire
> administration position rested on Nixon's doctrine of executive
> privilege. But but but Nixon *lost.*
>
> Nor can you consider Ken Lay a member of the administration. Or can you :)
>
> Dana________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
