You mean, you don't believe that the right to be free is worth fighting and
dying for? You would accept the yoke of dictatorship rather than be free?
And where in the Bill of Rights does it say "do no harm"?
I'll answer that for you -- it says it no where. Read it for yourself:
http://www.nara.gov/exhall/charters/billrights/billrights.html
What we are all taught as school children is that we have a responsibility
not to trample on the rights of other U.S. citizens. We have a
responsibility to respect and protect the rights of others. We are also
taught -- at least I was in the '60s -- that our rights are worth fighting
and dying for, as men from throughout our history have done.
If men and women had not been willing to make the ultimate sacrifice in the
1770s, there would be no U.S.A. today. And of course, if people of the free
world had not been willing to stand up to aggressors in the 1940s, dictators
would rule the world today.
As for the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, legal rulings and common
acceptance of the law have generally found that people within the borders of
the U.S. and terroritories have all of the legal protections therein, not
just U.S. citizens.
Obviously, in times of war, ensuring due process (Amendment V) before
killing somebody is not practical. But .... I'm at a lost to proceed here
.. I'm am so much under the impression that you believe that rather than
fight, we should just accept the shackles of bondage, that freedom is not
worth killing and dying for ... that is a frame of mind I find totally
incomprehensible ... I don't know how to answer it. I mean, yes, we would
rather not kill in the name of freedom, but ... sometimes ... it MUST be
done. Freedom must be defended no matter what the cost.
Since you come from a country of freedom, I hope your fellow countrymen do
not feel as you do, or you soon will no longer be free. It certainly wasn't
the feeling of your countrymen in previous chapters of your nation's
history, as many of your forebears fought and died valiantly in the name of
freedom.
One final point ... if you think the meaning of the Bill of Rights is very
clear, you are a very smart man, because legions of lawyers have made
millions of dollars arguing over what those words mean and how they should
be applied. Almost all cases taken by the Supreme Court over the last 200
years have dealt with just those amendments.
H.
-----Original Message-----
From: Trent Shepherd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 3:28 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: They (Americans) can't see why they are hated
So lo and be hold the right to bear arms and blow the crap out of anyone who
stands in the way of your right
> to pursue the virtues of money (i.e., capitalism (economic
> freedom), the most important and only righteous economic system),
> individual rights (which are God-given) and freedom (also God-given)
is your right?
> I think my meaning is clear.
that's why I am afraid of Americans.
Trent
BTW.
Look at your own bill of rights which says you have the right to pursue all
the things as long as you do no harm anyone else.
I think the meaning in this bill was clear!!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, 16 September 2001 3:15 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: They (Americans) can't see why they are hated
>
>
> In other words, you want to play semantic games.
>
> I think my meaning is clear. You don't need to twist it.
>
> As for your final graph. If we stop pursuing power and money and
> individual
> rights and freedom (especially the latter three of that list, which are
> vitally important pursuits), then the terrorists have won. Power
> under pins
> the ability to pursue the virtues of money (i.e., capitalism (economic
> freedom), the most important and only righteous economic system),
> individual
> rights (which are God-given) and freedom (also God-given) -- without these
> three things, life is not worth living.
>
>
> H.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trent Shepherd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 1:13 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: They (Americans) can't see why they are hated
>
>
> It was not a case of my "missing the point". It was more a case of looking
> at the truth and seeing it for what it really is. I was once taught the
> difference between truth and honesty. The truth might be "that I
> went to the
> bank" however the honesty would also tell you "that while I was there I
> robbed it" When you use a diluted analogy of a situation
> substituting sugar
> for arms the context of meaning changes entirely.
>
> [snip]
>
> It is a time where as people of the world we can stand up and be
> accountable
> for what we have let happen for so long. The pursuit of power and
> money and
> individual rights and freedom at the expense of others has got to stop.
> Perhaps we can think about the freaky hippies of the
> sixties/seventies with
> their mantra of "love and compassion". Hey wait a minute are these not the
> same people who have the power and our now running the world. How
> quickly we
> become corrupted.
>
>
>
> Trent Shepherd
>
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
