>Obviously the issue is his new film, but I would have
>expected to see
>critiques of the film and facts it presents.��Rather
>what you've done is
>collect the filmmaker's opinions without offering a
>reason for doing so.
Since only rabid Bush Haters will see the film and you
folks only want to discuss it with people that have
seen it that leaves it a Bush hating discussion.
So, I started a new thread.
Of course there is the mention of 100 republicans
getting free tickets? I wonder how many people
actually paid to see the film.
Will the DNC claim these tickets as advertising or is
it considered soft money spending?
The reason is the Title: Know Your Enemy
>I've not seen the movie yet, but I wonder if this is
>because the film does,
>actually, tell the truth?��Were there so few
>criticisms of the work to levy
>that you had to go after the man?��Is it just to show
>that the film comes
>from a certain perspective?��Is there somebody,
>anybody that thinks this
>film is in any way a balanced accounting?
See above.
>All of these statements are opinions.��None have
>enough depth to draw any of
>the conclusions you have (so I would say that the
>answer to all your
>questions is "there's not enough information here to
>answer your question").
They're his opinions and he hates Americans. How much
more info do you need?
-sm
>Jim Davis
---------------------------------
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
