> Sam Morris wrote:
> > Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Sam Morris wrote:
> >>>
>
>>>http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?messageDate=2004-04-14
> >>>
> >>> (He supports Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda over
> America and wants them
> >>> to win? -sam)
> >>
> >> I don't see anything about who he ants to win. He
> >> just predicts who will win.
> >
> > He's saying the terrorist are the Revolution the
> > minutemen!
>
> No, he is saying that about "The Iraqis who have
> risen up against the occupation".
>
> Are people rising up against a foreign occupation of
> their country by definition terrorists?
>
But they're not rising up. It's the Sadam loyalist and
Al Queda that's rising up. They are the enemy and
Moore seems to be supporting them. We aren't occuping,
we're freeing them from tyranny. And they have there
country back today.
>
> > How clear does he have to be for you to know who
> he's chearing for?
>
> Would minuteman be considered terrorists nowadays?
>
>
> >>> (Did somebody mention the brown shirts in the
> other thread? And he's
> >>> anti-Israel, how did I guess that. -sam)
> >>
> >> What does anti-Israel mean? That he is against
> their
> >> policies? Their existence?
> >
> > It's all part of the same ball of wax, right?
>
> No.
>
> So what does being anti-Israel mean?
I would like to know, Strange how the man with so many
opinions won't let anyone besides 60 minutes interview
him. I would love to know what he thinks the solution
to Israel problem is.
>
>
> > To me, my opinion is he's claiming Israel is one
> of the top three problems.
>
> That is not what he says.
>
>
> But lets entertain the suggestion for now. You're
> saying it is not? What yould you rate higher?
>
> Jochem
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
