>Gore why not? At least he had some intelligence, and is not an
>ex-alcoholic coke head.
Personally, I think Gore is less fit to lead this country then Bush. He
doesn't have the respect of his own party. His backing of Dean was
considered a political maneuver to re-establish himself within the DNP and
botched attempt at that when Kerry defeated Dean. He didn't have the
balls to stand up to his own party about the FLA issue and he didn't have
the balls to relaunch another campaign this year because he thought Bush
was unbeatable in 2004. Then again a lot of ppl thought Bush would be
unstoppable in 2004.
Once Gore beat Bradley for the Democratic Nomination I couldn't bring
myself to vote for Gore. The man has little conviction and less
courage. Unfit to represent the US. He didn't stand by his President when
he needed him and in fact tried to distance himself from Clinton so that
his own presidential ambitions could be persued. The best thing I can say
about Gore is that he isn't Bush, but that seems like a poor reason to
elect him as President.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
