what about 100's of years ago, when 14 yr old girls were getting
married?
was that wrong?
I know, from when I was younger, from the time a chick was 15 or so,
until the time she was 20+, not much changed, apart from one thing.
her brain.
and that's the point.
they don't know what they are getting themselves into, they just don't.
the implications go much farther and wider than the orgasm attained, its
resounding, and I was engaged to one that went through a much worse
situation, and the effects were immeasurable...i left her due to it!
the teacher shoulda stuck to some C batteries and the Wascally Wabbit.
much safer, and doesn't get ya on the front page of usa today.
...tony
tony weeg
senior web applications architect
navtrak, inc.
www.navtrak.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
410.548.2337
visit www.antiwrap.com to send long url emails to your friends!
-- dont mistake my perfection as arrogance
anonymous
-----Original Message-----
From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 12:02 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Teacher sex story
I know the law.
What do you think the age of kids having sex is in the US now? In the UK
they pegged it that most kids had already had sex by age 15.
Does this mean that those children will be harmed as well for having sex
with each other?
Or does this harm apply primarily to relationships where one participant
is younger and the other much older?
What about if the teacher was 18?
Or one person 15 the other one 16?
Is it really due to harm, or is it primarily public perception?
-Gel
-----Original Message-----
From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:15 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Teacher sex story
See, the deal is that if you're less than 16 (in most states), you're
not legally old enough to consent to sex. So, it's looked upon the
same way as if she'd had sex with someone who was passed out drunk or
someone who was immobilized for some reason. So, it's essentially
statutory rape or sexual abuse.
And, while I don't want to come off as sounding all uptight about sex
or anything, I've seen the effects on overly sexualized teens enough
to know that it can have some pretty serious ramifications. (My mom
worked with sexually abused and sexually active kids for a long time.)
So, Gel, whether the kid was begging for it or not, it's still the
adults responsibility to set boundaries. It's a total mis-use of trust
and power.
Gel said...
> Just read it.
>
> Sounds like she was just in it for the adventure.
>
> I'm sure the kid wasn't 'hurt', it certainly didn't sound like
co-ercion
> was involved.
>
> No mention was made of," If you don't do this you're going to fail" or
> even " do this if you want to pass".
>
> If the kid were older it would of course be seen as consenting adults,
> and the worst that would happen to her is loose her job or be
suspended
> for having sex with one of her students, which I understand is frowned
> upon in educational institutions, or at least it isn't supposed to be
> flaunted or come out in public.
>
> It sounds like the co-ercion/extortion may have been from the kids,
> rather than from the teacher.
>
> -Gel
>
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
