> Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> How many times do I have to ask before you will explain what
>> "anti-Israel" means? I must say I am quite disappointed by your
>> current way "to suggest things but not actually prove anything
>> just plant the thought in your mind".
>
> I did answer this way back.
No, you did not. You answered the following: "It's all part of
the same ball of wax, right? The oil companies, Israel, Halliburton."
That does not answer the question.
> Someone that states Israel is the problem is propbably
> anti-Israel. To know what anti-Israel is in this case
> someone would have to ask him what the solution to the
> problem is and that might be your answer. I'm sorry I
> forgot the question mark.
<quote>
(Did somebody mention the brown shirts in the other thread? And
he's anti-Israel, how did I guess that. -sam)
</quote>
You can add as many question marks as you want to that sentence,
but that only makes "how did I guess that" a question.
"he's anti-Israel" remains your own assertion.
> I was asking if he was anti-Israel.
You were not.
I see two ways this can go:
- you admit your discrepant scatter shots do not cohere at any point
- you end in my killfile
Jochem
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
