Exactly.   The whole brohaha with the 10 commandments, the pledge, the
confederate flag,  etc are distractions used to avoid public notice of
the real issues.

Maur

----- Original Message -----
From: Monique Boea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:34:45 -0400
Subject: RE: Speaking of church and state
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I think the whole 10 commandments issue is trivial.



When I go to a courthouse, I really could care less what is displayed.



I don't even pay attention to what is on the walls, etc.



Historical documents belong in museums and if I need to read the 10COM I go

to the bible.



There are a lot more important things to fight about.


-----Original Message-----

From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 3:19 PM

To: CF-Community

Subject: Re: Speaking of church and state

I would argue that placing the 10 Commandments on government property

without the assumption that we need to place the 8-fold path, etc.

there, too, is inherently giving preferential treatment for Christianity.

Further, by classifying the 10 Commandments as a "historical document"

you open the door to judgement calls about what does and does not

classify as such.  At what point can you deny a request to have another

religious doctrine posted next to the 10C based on the idea that it is

not a document which is important to history?  Whose history?  How old

does it have to be to qualify as historical?

Sorry if I seem a bit ... overenthusiastic ... about this, but around

here, the 10C in schools was a big deal, and it still pisses me off that

others want to weasel their way around in order to dictate religion to

my family members.

--BenD

Nick McClure wrote:

> I disagree that posting the 10 Commandments on government property would

be

> equivalent to the establishment of state religion, I also disagree that it

> keeps others from practicing their own religion, unless your religion

> specifically states that you can never see the religious documents of

> another religion.

>

> I think items like the 10 Commandments can be shown as historical

documents,

> so long as they are not given preferential treatment over any other

document

> religious or otherwise.

  _____________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to