areas. So by Bush's logic shouldn't we be attacking the Kurds. Mind
you since they are our very staunch allies, and only would have done
it with our OK, in that case shouldn't we be attacking ourselves?
larry
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 13:16:03 -0400, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not that I recall, Bush claimed that Saddam supported terrorists, which he
> did, he gave $20,000 to the family of any Palestinian suicide bomber.
>
> He allowed groups to operate out of remote areas of Iraq, in the opening
> months of the war US Forces destroyed and went into a few terrorists camps
> killing hundreds of terrorists and even discovered the plans and ingredients
> to make risen, but the chemicals and their ingredients were never linked
> back to Saddam, but he still let them stay there.
>
> Bush was very clear to never state that Saddam or Iraq helped plan or had
> any direct involvement in the 9/11 attacks.
>
> But they always hinted at Iraq and Terrorist connections, the media did
> their part to spin that into Iraq-Al Qaeda links and thus Iraq-9/11 links.
>
> _____
>
> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 12:20 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: 9/11 Commission to Cheney - You're still wrong.
>
> agreed. But the issue arises when half the viewership of Fox news
> thinks 9/11 is the reason for the US presence in Iraq. Also, don't
> have time to look right now but at the time the news stories about
> that came out didn't they cite statements by Bush to that effect? I
> will look later if nobody else has in the meantime.
>
> Dana
>
> They are the 9/11 commission, not the Al Qaeda/Iraq link commission.
>
> _____
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
