Let's take a gay man.
Why can't he marry? Isn't it for what he is? Not for what he does?
What if he promises never, ever ever to have sex. Can he then marry? If not, then it is for who he is (and who his partner is), not what he does, isn't it?
What exactly do you mean by "what they DO?"
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/16/04 09:08AM >>>
THANK YOU!!!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 8:24 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
WRONG
Whether you believe homosexuality is genetic, learned, voluntary,
whatever.....african americans were discriminated against for who they are,
homosexuals would be discriminated against for what they DO.
A distinct difference, whether it matters or not......*shrug*
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Graeme
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
That really, really baffles me. They are just the same in my mind. In
both cases, you have people that are being discriminated against
because of who they are.
-Kevin
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
