>>check your facts man.... way older than the previous which
>>you sited
>>at 2000+ years... it's pre-christian.
> The 2000+ years was to bring it into Christianity's
> timeframe.
> Sure, marriage is older than that. But MANY marriages in
> those times were to more than just 1 man and 1 woman. I
> was trying to give the benefit of the doubt to the
> "marriage is 1 man 1 woman" rule
Ahh... okay, I can see that... I disagree with it, but I can see it. I
don't think it's a good thing to confine it to within the realms of
christian history.
>>> Marriage - civil union between man and woman. 100+ years
>>> old
>>Although all the currently recognized documents which
>>describe the
>>union don't describe it in this way. They describe it as
>>being between
>>2 persons, hence the debate.
> True. But even though the law may have been worded a
> certain way, it was only PRACTICED one way for all those
> years.
okay, I'll buy that... my big question at that point is when was the
first homosexual marriage/union performed, where and by whom? Has it
really only been 10 years? I thought there were some homosexual unions
performed during the 60's or 70's and the whole free love / sexual
revolution period.
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
