given the known harm that it causes and the almost universal revulsion
it inspires? All morality and compassion aside, it would be an utterly
stupid move from the point of view of public relations.
And more to *my* point, how would gay marriage lead to such a thing?
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Monique Boea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:29:11 -0400
Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It is unlawful for a man to sleep with his daughter.
Why would it be surprising that one day a group may want to change this law?
-----Original Message-----
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 1:58 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
Monique
You keep saying this. I see no reason why gay marriage would make it
ok to have sex with children, nor have you supported this assertion.
Dana
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:48:53 -0400, Monique Boea
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> where does it stop then?
>
>
> We are going to become a law-less society, so everyone can be happy.
>
>
> If that's where we're going then so be it.
>
>
> I'll still be a conservative, Christian, republican.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 6:59 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
>
> Monique Boea wrote:
> >
> > But if a group of people can change laws (and PLEASE don't compare this
> > to the black human rights issue) then what is to stop other groups from
> > changing the laws to further change marriage, age limits, sex limits,
> > crime, etc. Like a man wanting to marry his daughter. Do we further
> > change the laws to accommodate him? Or a woman who wants to sleep with
a
> > 14 year old.
>
> How do you think we got the current laws?
>
> That's right, we got the current laws because groups of people could
> convince sufficient people to change the existing law to their views. That
> is a continuous proces and has served over hundreds of years to produce
the
> laws that are currently in place.
> Are you seriously suggesting we stop changing law, send the entire
> legislative body home and live with the current laws forever?
>
> Jochem
> _____________________________________
>
_____________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
