anyone can own whatever sort of firearm they want, or it means that
the individual state is guarenteed an armed militia (now know as the
National Guard).
Make your choice.
Besides did they really need those Barret 50 cal sniper rifles with
the armour piercing bullets?
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:13:52 -0400, Monique Boea
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and wasn't David Corresh (SP?) denied the right to bear arms or did I miss
> the real reason they went in on him?
>
> OR am I misunderstanding this amendment.
>
> Amendment II
>
> A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,
> the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
>
> Sorry guys I can't stop reading this :)
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
