http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail58.html
http://www.homestarrunner.com/trogdor.html
- Jim
Kevin Graeme wrote:
>mmmm....trogans.
>
>-Kevin
>
>On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:57:44 -0700, Cameron Childress
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/07/20/2250256&tid=152&tid=95
>>
>>Macromedia recently announced that its latest version of Flash Lite (a
>>limited Flash for mobile devices) was to support SVG Tiny 1.1, and
>>support it fully (though no one has yet been able to verify that
>>assertion). For a moment, the Web community wondered if they might be
>>playing nice at last, after yielding to massive pressure from the
>>mobile market to support W3C and 3GPP standards, or if they simply
>>meant to use SVG as a trojan to get Flash into mobile devices. An
>>article freshly published on Macromedia's web site clearly makes the
>>case that they're after the latter, speading as much FUD as possible
>>along the way. Thankfully, Antoine Quint decided to respond in a brief
>>O'Reilly Net article in which he debunks Macromedia's marketing lies
>>one by one, and expands on the wondrous features of SVG Tiny 1.1 and
>>the shortly upcoming SVG Tiny 1.2 that make people drool before their
>>mobile phones
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
