Megan's law being a "slippery slope" and at some point it becoming
required to post a sign in front of your house with a list of all the
crimes you'd committed (littering, vandalism, loitering, jay-walking)
with a number. So when a couple moves into town and doesn't post a
sign, everyone in the town gets all pissed off because they believe it
will devalue their property. They go through all sorts of measures to
try and dig up dirt on the couple to force them to post a sign or to
make them commit some misdemeanor so they'd have to post it.
Eventually one of the new couple leaves and one of the existing
residents being completely fed up with everyone else goes out in the
middle of the night and paints over everyone else's signs with various
different things that the townsfolk were conspiring against the new
couple. He adds "vandalism" to his own sign with the town population
number next to it.
> that's what the story said... assuming your husband had
> joint custody.
> The story I saw did not say why they felt so strongly that
> it was not
> in the interest of the child, but it did say that the
> father had not
> consented to the adoption and spent thousands of dollars
> looking for
> his son. Let me see if I can find a link.
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?D4FC218E8
> Looks like this is a quirk in the New York state Megan's
> Law.... but
> is it the only state statute with this quirk? Dunno.
> Dana
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
http://www.turnkey.to/ontap
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
