Also, I think most people fail to see the gravity in the entire operation - it was the first time in history that the US launched a preemptive war.
Howie
----- Original Message -----
From: Won Lee
To: CF-Community
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: OReilly vs. Moore
At 12:00 7/28/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>I thought it was a good interview. I thought it was pretty silly for
>Moore to not admin that if Bush was given bad evidence and based his
>words on them that he wasn't lieing. At the same time, Moore was 100%
>right that even if Bush didn't lie, even if it was an accident, it
>doesn't make it ok.
>
>-r
I too agree the interview was very good. I can see Moore's point
though. There some that believe that Bush's reason to go into Iraq wasn't
really about the WMD but something else. WMD was just a convenient excuse
and the validity of the intelligence reports weren't checked because it
wasn't the true reason for going in the first place.
I for one, don't think there is enough evidence to support that
statement. I have heard it enough to believe that it's shared by more then
a few people. A common belief is that we went in for oil - just as an example.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
