these three terrorist attacks that would justify going to war and losing
1000 American lives and 10,000 Americans seriously wounded?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:59 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: OReilly vs. Moore
In order to go to war, which is an extraordinary act, there must be
extraordinary evidence.
What evidence do you have that Saddam was responsible for these three
terrorist attacks that would justify going to war and losing 1000 American
lives and 10,000 Americans seriously wounded?
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/28/04 02:44PM >>>
I didn't say they WERE connected nor did I saw they WEREN'T
What I did say is that it seems more probable to me that they were.
>> Saddam had no role in any of these three attacks.
And you are the expert on the matter?
And please don't quote any media soruces, because it is all hear say.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:39 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: OReilly vs. Moore
Monique,
You are definitely confused about who did what to whom.
The three incidents you mentioned were perpetrated by Al Qaida.
Saddam had no role in any of these three attacks.
War in Afghanistan was justified by your example.
War in Iraq was NOT justified by your examples.
Who exactly is the "them" in your last sentence?
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/28/04 02:24PM >>>
Ok so a blowing up of a US ship, a US embassy, etc, THEN 911
How far should we have gone
(And I don't by that Sadaam was no in with Bin Laden story)
What did you want them to take out the state of California maybe? Then would
it have been ok?
_____
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
