The argument's over when you whip out the "liberal" label.  If someone questions why we invaded Iraq then they're a liberal.  If they don't want to give tax cuts to the rich then they're liberal.  

Sheesh.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Monique Boea
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:24 PM
  Subject: RE: OReilly vs. Moore

  and how many dangerous assumptions have you all made today?

  I would beleive that iraq and afghanastan are both enemies of the U.S. than
  any thing I've heard on this thread today.

  For you all to be pumping out that liberal, equal rights craps all day (of
  course unless we talk about Africa or what's going on in the US with people
  of color, then you get awfully quiet), you have absolutely no respect for
  other people's opinions.

  -----Original Message-----
  From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:08 PM
  To: CF-Community
  Subject: RE: OReilly vs. Moore

  That's a dangerous assumption.
  I hope you're never on a jury.

  > both enemies of the US.

  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:33 PM
  > To: CF-Community
  > Subject: RE: OReilly vs. Moore

  > What makes you think they were?

  >> Ok I lied, one more....

  >> Do you actually think Bin Laden and Sadaam were not
  >> connected at all?

  s. isaac dealey   954.927.5117

  new epoch : isn't it time for a change?

  add features without fixtures with
  the onTap open source framework
  http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
    _____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to