Yup.  So Bush didn't win the election.  But he didn't "steal" it either.  Gore
lost it.

I gotta go.  Going to see the new Bourne movie.

TTFN
  -----Original Message-----
  From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:49 PM
  To: CF-Community
  Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC

  I remember something similar about military votes. Let's assume you
  are right and that those votes were Republican, just for the sake of
  the argument. It doesn't matter. The issue with Florida as I see it is
  this:

  All of the votes were not counted.

  If Democrats caused votes to not be counted, that is wrong. If
  Republicans caused votes to not be counted, that is wrong.
  If Florida law said the intent of the voter is the standard then
  Florida law should have been followed. If the Supreme Court decision
  prevented the implementation of the applicable provisions of the
  Florida Constitution then that is wrong.

  My understanding of that election result btw is that if Gore had won a
  recount in the areas where he asked for a recount he would still have
  lost. However if he had asked for a recount statewide and not just in
  the areas where he thought the recount might go his way then he would
  have won.

  So I am open to the idea that the Gore camp tried to get cute. And
  apparently it cost him. Nonetheless, the votes were not counted
  properly and the proximate cause was a Supreme Court decision that
  does not stand up to scrutiny.

  imho :)

  Dana

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:46:28 -0500
  Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
  To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  Ok, wrong term(damn, I am suffering from Bush-idis).  How about "funny
  business".  I believe that one or more of the democratically controlled
voting
  areas either tried to or did disallow military ballets.  As I remember the
  commentary, the military historically votes Republican.  Then to accuse Bush
  of trying to steal the election, to go against the will of the people is the
  highest level of hypocrisy.

  My point being that both sides used all of the tools possible to win.  It
had
  very little to do with the will of the people, everything to do with the
will
  of each party.  if the Florida Supreme court would have gone the other way,
  then the Dems would have gone to the Supreme court.  There was just too much
  at stake for either party to not pursue this to the highest levels possible.

  Andy

    -----Original Message-----
    From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 3:17 PM
    To: CF-Community
    Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC

    There was something about military ballots. I'd have to look it up,
    but there was something. However, aren't you assuming that those votes
    would have been republican? And uh... correct me if I am wrong but the
    democrats did not run the election did they? The one I participated in
    administering in Maryland involved vote counters and observers from
    each side I think.

    Also gerrymandering usually involves redrawing districts to make the
    election of certain candidates more likely. Am not aware of
    allegations of this in Florida; could have missed them, sure, but
    aren't the Republicans in power down there?

    Dana

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:52:28 -0500
    Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
    To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

    Good to tangle with you again....

    Question:  Did the democrats across run a lily clean election?  Or, just
  focus
    on Florida.  Wasn't there something about Military ballets, for example.

    Andy

      -----Original Message-----
      From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
      Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:27 PM
      To: CF-Community
      Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC

      stop the gerrymandering? <g>

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:32:54 -0500
      Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC
      To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

      I am confused.  I didn't realize that the Supreme Court changed the vote
  in
      Florida.  Didn't they just stop the gerrymandering?

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Sandy Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:44 AM
        To: CF-Community
        Subject: RE: Electoral College/DNC

        Didn't the Supreme Court give Bush the 2000 election?  The electoral
    college
        just ratified that decision IMHO.

          _____

        From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

        The electoral college gave Bush the 2000 election. Without it, Gore
  wins,
    by
        the popular vote....and thats just the way it should
      be.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to