That quote proves that the original Bush claim that there "was a transaction"
was completely false.
However, the question you are answering was for evidence that there was
buildings, etc. ready and waiting, which was once speculated, but never were
found.    Does this mean we are back to the trailers and Toyota Pickups?

----- Original Message -----
  From: Sam Morris

  http://www.truthnews.net/world/2004070109.htm

  The Senate Intelligence Committee -- a bipartisan
  panel co-chaired by a Republican and a Democrat --
  found that, far from disproving the Iraq-Niger story,
  Ambassador Wilson�s report was interpreted as
  providing "some confirmation of foreign government
  service reporting" that Iraq had sought uranium in
  Niger. This report is available for all to read online
  at http://intelligence.senate.gov.

  When these findings are seen in light of the report
  submitted to Congress by weapons inspector David Kay,
  there is no way around the fact that Saddam Hussein
  was seeking to acquire nuclear weapons, in addition to
  his other efforts to expand his arsenal.

  The October 2003 Kay Report states, "In 1999, the
  Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) began an
  expansion of its laboratories and research activities
  and increased its overall funding levels." This is the
  same time Iraqi officials visited Africa in an attempt
  to acquire nuclear material! In addition, Kay found
  that scientists were ordered to be on call to begin
  full-blown nuclear research once again.

  The moral of the story is that the intelligence on
  this issue, far from being flawed, proves that Iraq
  was pursuing its nuclear weapons programs. With this
  evidence in mind, the Butler Report states that the
  claims made public by both Prime Minister Blair and
  President Bush that Iraq attempted to acquire nuclear
  material Africa were "well-founded."
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to