> Given that the Washington Times is owned by Rev.
> Moon (of the Moonies
> fame) and has been caught more than a few times not
> only getting the
> story wrong, but fabricating elements of some of
> those stories, I put
> no credulance in the paper.
OK
> The story on Roy Moore in the TFP was incorrect in a
> number of
> different ways, first is that he substantially
> violated the law and
> the constitution, and was quite unrepentant. The
> article in question
> stated that it was persecution by the ACLU. Hello!
> Excuse Me but the
> issue was his violating the constitution.
I just read the article and there's no mention of the
ACLU. Maybe they changed it?
> As for reputable papers, Times of London, Manchester
> Guardian, the
> Washington Post, San Francisco Examiner are good
> examples as is the
> Ottawa Citizen, as for radio, the CBC, BBC and NPR
> are good, as is
> CSPAN. I don't watch cable or broadcast media.
WOW, those are all extremely liberal. Times of London
being the least biased but still biased. Can't speak
for CBC. Know wonder you�re arguments are so lopsided.
-sm
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
