For one thing the phrase endorses montheism - worship of a single god.
What about atheists, or polytheists?

I have no objection to pledging allegiance to the flag, in fact it
should be encouraged. My objection is the insertion of "Under God"
into the pledge.

larry

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:31:22 -0500, Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Larry C. Lyons
>
>  The phase Under God as inserted into the pledge states an outright
>  governemental endorsement of a certain religion, which according to
>  the constitution is not allowed. It does not matter whether the person
>  is a believer or not, what does matter is a governement mandated
>  religious practice.
>
>  larry
>
>  I perceive that statement somewhat a stretch.   I do not think pledging
> allegiance to the flag, and hence to country implies any religious endorsement,
> rather  a historical statement of the country you are pledging loyalty top.  The
> country was founded by a people fleeing religious opression (i. e. Church of
> England) and noting is going to change that.  This is still the country we all
> love, even if we take issue with those who govern it from time to time.
>
>  As far as the coin and currency, the inscription; "In God we trust" does not
> make it any less legal tender for all debt, and is easilyt spendable, worldwide,
> in fact is coveted by many, including entire regimes where the inscription is
> completely ignored.
>
>  In summary, much ado about nothing.     One is either loyal to his country or
> he isn't.
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to