-sm
--- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blanket insults do not a refutation constitute, my
> son :)
>
> Dana
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
> To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> You're babbling :)
>
>
>
> --- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > how can you abuse something that gives you almost
> > unlimited power?
> > Remember this statement comes from the
> > administration of a man who
> > eight months into planning the invasion of Iraq
> (at
> > least -- more if
> > you believe those who say planning predated 9/11)
> > was still
> > maintaining that there was no plan of attack on
> his
> > desk. Ya. It was
> > on Cheney's desk. Or maybe Rice's.
> >
> > Dana
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 09:18:04 -0500
> > Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
> > To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Uh huh. IMO, ust because she was part of the
> Clinton
> > administration
> > doesn't make her automatically right. Waco,
> clipper
> > chip, etc.
> >
> > -Kevin
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:36:20 -0700 (PDT), Sam
> Morris
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > There is no abuse of the Patriot Act. None.
> >
> > Yeah, that's right. Snatch and grab of US citizens
> > and holding them
> > without reprsentation or even admitting who they
> > were wasn't an abuse
> > of power and totally unconstitutional. No, not at
> > all. Oh wait, not an
> > "abuse of the Patriot Act". Well yeah, maybe
> that's
> > true.
> >
> > -Kevin
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
