exploits of children? Is the thinking that if you increase the amount
of required documentation (which the exploiters are already not
providing) that the exploiters will decide to stop or be easier to
catch?
> Why are you so upset about laws that are intended to
> prevent sexual expolits of children?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bill Wheatley
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:55 AM
> Subject: Re: pain in the ass
> anyone you pay for their services (of being naked) is
> going to have to be tracked and in a seperate folder
> specifcally for this.
> William Wheatley
> Coldfusion Guru
> Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
> for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Larry C. Lyons
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:53 AM
> Subject: Re: pain in the ass
> "But having to keep a link of every image ever used is
> going to be a
> big pain in the ass."
> A big pain in the ass - wouldn't that apply only to
> certain types of
> pron films and images?
> larry
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 11:43:24 -0400, Bill Wheatley
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.ibill.com/news/Title18USC2257.pdf
> > This is going to be a huge pain in the ass and not
> > really help too much. Time to write a letter :>
> > I'll post it here for proofreading before i mail it
> > off to the DoJ. Some of the rules are good like
> > saying Drivers License & Passport only.
> > But having to keep a link of every image ever used
> > is going to be a big pain in the ass.
> >
> > William Wheatley
> > Coldfusion Guru
> >
> > Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
> > for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
> >
> >
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
