That is the cowards way out. By putting your name to it, you applied your
credibility to the article.
So now you are saying that you know/knew that it was bad press, but
circulated it anyway without a comment?
How do you justify such behavior? Is this the same sort of BS that you access
the right/Bush of doing?
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 11:30 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Goss says Goss isn't qualified
I made no comment on the article - I simply posted it. I found it
interesting. So, now posting interesting information is the low road?
sheesh
----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Ousterhout
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 12:21 PM
Subject: RE: Goss says Goss isn't qualified
Neither is acceptable. We all must work to fight smear campaigns on
either
side. This trash detracts from real debates on the issues. It is totally
unacceptable and all who participate in circulating such trash need to be
told
so in no uncertain terms.
That is why I replied the way I did to Howie. He knew it was trash but
didn't
care because supported a view he held, so took the low road.
Andy
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
