> nomination because they didn't feel he was a particularly strong
> candidate on his own merits. Their worst fears are starting to come
> true. He keeps this up, and he's gonna be in a heep of trouble.
That's the basic problem, he's a back-bencher. His goofy "Reporting for Duty!" statement at the convention is starting to come back at him too. The issue of the Cambodia incursion, the stories about the medals and how they were won, the reenactment of episodes on his camera- all that stuff makes his words ring hollow. I'm not sure who would have been better, though. Clark? Not. Leiberman? Not going to get the Dem nod, too conservaive. Edwards? Still too young. Dean? Ha, Karl Rove wishes. Next time there will be a better field.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
