> > made a point
> > of releasing new builds as soon as I'm able to fix a
> > bug or add a
> > feature, just to let people see what's going on with it
> > regularly and
> > avoid having a long dought of activity.
>
> How many people are you using your framework these days? I
> have yet to try it out... no time :-(
It's hard to say... It's been around for about a year now. I know more
people are using it than will admit to it :P because when I gave a
presentation to the CFUG in Austin some months back one of the guys
who worked for the city there said he'd seen some of the function
libraries used in some of their code.
This may sound a bit odd, but in all honesty, off the top of my head I
don't know how to check my weblogs to see how many downloads there
have been for the core files archive.
There are a handfull of folks on the framework forums now, although
they've not been up very long, and I refuse to publish statistics for
them yet on the grounds that they may incriminate me. :P I did get a
private email from one of the forum members recently saying that he's
hoping to use it for a larger production app on MX soon. He was asking
about BlueDragon on the forum, although BD still has some bugs that
prevent the framework from loading. (Specific details are on the forum
-- I don't have the url handy.)
An early version of the framework (1.2 I think - it's at 1.6 now) is
afaik still in use at a large defense industry company in Dallas
although iirc I'm not allowed to talk about what they're using
publicly. I'd have to go back and look at my papers and see what I'm
allowed to say to people about that contract. They're using it for an
xml-syndication project in their recruiting department... at the time
it was on CF5, though I think I remember them mentioning an upgrade to
MX after my contract ended.
Over the weekend I'll probably be removing some custom tags that were
written before the html library to accomodate the active-content
changes to Internet Explorer that never became a reality. The html
library is a better model for display anyway, so the flash tags just
aren't really valuable at this point. I should probably also update
the flash functions in the html library to use the xhtml-valid "Flash
Satay" type object tags when the doctype is xhtml.
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
http://www.fusiontap.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
