----- Original Message -----
From: S. Isaac Dealey
To: CF-Community
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: Pentagon coverup?
I'm not certain I believe either of them really... They also don't
make any comment about nearby video footage of the crash having been
confiscated (and not subsequently released). Would be nice to see a
film clip from one of the closed-circuit cameras in the area.
Presumably these wouldn't be national secrets unless there were some
legitimate reason to cover up what actually happened there. So while
the snopes information makes a lot of sense, it's still not a complete
picture. Who's to say that the "debris" photo the snopes site shows
isn't staged? It would be very easy to place a random piece of garbage
on the ground way back there and snap the photo to have something to
show people and say "look! Debris from the plane!" It certainly
doesn't seem to me from the photos like there's enough debris or
damage from the wings ("blackened sections" to me is not absolute
proof of a wing, given that blackness can be created by soot and fire)
-- even if as they say, the wings folded inward during impact. That's
admittedly not a professional opinion, it's just some schmuck looking
at the photos. It just seems like an oddly symetrical hole given the
situation.
I'm not saying it's true - I'm also not saying it's a hoax. I'm just
saying the information I've had about it seems to me like an
incomplete enough picture to leave room for more than one possibility.
If a magician can make a living making people see things that aren't
real, then it's just _possible_ that what we're told happened at the
pentagon isn't entirely true.
<snip>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
