G wrote:
> The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or
> an organized group against people or property with the intention of
> intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for
> ideological or political reasons.
>
> There is some wiggle room in that definition, but i think its clear
> cut enough that you can make a legal distinction between terrorists
> and non terrorists.

Even if I were to agree on either the definition or the 'some wiggle room', that still does not answer the question who gets to make that distinction.

Jochem
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to