Which is exactly why I have applied to absentee vote, at least that way
there is a paper trail.  The voting machines suck,


Take a look at this:
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/?q=node/view/78

Issue: Manipulation technique found in the Diebold central tabulator --
1,000 of these systems are in place, and they count up to two million votes
at a time.

By entering a 2-digit code in a hidden location, a second set of votes is
created. This set of votes can be changed, so that it no longer matches the
correct votes. The voting system will then read the totals from the bogus
vote set. It takes only seconds to change the votes, and to date not a
single location in the U.S. has implemented security measures to fully
mitigate the risks.

This program is not "stupidity" or sloppiness. It was designed and tested
over a series of a dozen version adjustments.

Sandy Clark
http://www.shayna.com <http://www.shayna.com/>
CF Pretty Accessible at http://www.shayna.com/blog
Now offering 4 days Hands on CSS training October 11-14th. Rockville, MD.
For more information go to:
http://www.teratech.com/training/oc_classes.cfm#css


Earlier this week, a judge in Maryland threw out a
<http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjournal/business/9571051.htm?1c> request
for a preliminary injunction against Diebold's machines, ruling that
they are in fact more secure than paper ballots.  "

-Gel <http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=38>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to