As for the idea of "taking the fight to them", I think there is some validity in that. When our troops are blowing up terror camps in Afghanistan, killing known terrorists, disrupting their activities, and generally making life difficult for them in their home country....this seems to be a good strategy as opposed to waiting for them to try another attack.
This is very clear in Afghanistan....but in Iraq? Just who's fight are we fighting, and to whom are we taking it? Not so clear.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gruss Gott
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: The Republican Fear Machine is at it again
<snip>
----- Original Message -----
This is the same logic that says that since we're fighting the
terrorists in Iraq we don't have to "fight them on the street of
America".
So why have the Department of Homeland Security or the TSA? Why even
bother with security? After all, we're fighting the terrorists in
Iraq so, according to Mr. Bush, we needn't worry about security in
America.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
