In my humble oppinion it's because they haven't got enough evidence to draw saddam into the equation. When they can link him (via state sponsered terrorism) they will release the info and then bomb the f**k out of Iraq as well as going after bin laden.
The other advantage is to get as many countries to support america even before the countries know who it is they are going to war with... that way it makes it harder for the countries to back out when American pulls the gun out of the holster (subtle reference to 'wanted, dead or alive')... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Smyth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 1:47 AM Subject: evidence > My personal opinion is that P Bush should disclose evidence against bin > laden before any military attack on afganistan is made. > > Not that i'm pro bin laden, but the continued persistance to made the > evidence public, increases public perception (especially in foreign > countries) that the US are making him a scapegoat simply because they need > one. > > Acting without full disclosure will also rally countries who already harbour > anti american sentiments > > Mark > > Mark Smyth > Developer > SUeBS > 00 44 1865 880800 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.systemsunion.net > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
